Friday, May 1, 2009

Islam & the Beard

Today it is easy for people to “hate” Islam and Muslims in general. With the ever increasing influence of the media, and the actions of a few extremists representing the entire community, I do not blame the layman for falling prey to communal bias. All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing, and radical elements, regardless of region or religion, have always had a more action based approach than their moderate counterparts.

In the case of Islam, one of the primary side-effects of extremism involves facial hair. It is a highly painful decision for a Muslim to keep a beard these days (with or without moustache), without it having any religious connotation. To give a recent example, my cousin had recently graduated from high school and entered the realms of ‘college freedom’. Based on experience, I advised him to experiment with facial hair before he enters the real world of white collars and colourful ties. To my surprise, the idea faced a lot of resistance from some members of the family, particularly my aunt. “He will look like a terrorist, and you know the situation these days” she said. It was the perspective of a concerned mother who feared the social ostracising of her son by the increasingly communal public and an ever suspicious anti-Muslim government.

My cousin managed to sport a beard for a few months and also received some positive feedback about his newly acquired look. But this was the outcome in a reasonably well-off and influential Muslim family (elite?). I wonder what the conclusion would have been if he was living in Gujarat (the modern manifestation of hell for Indian Muslims) or belonged to a poverty stricken and uneducated Muslim family (the true majority), who face much greater risk should the government decide to label one of them as terrorists.

There is no doubt that society generally assumes a correlation between clean shaven individuals and decency, and that this debate has taken place, and will continue to do so, in a large number of households. But for Muslims this decision ceases to be a matter of simply looking proper, and becomes a fear factor. This fear has a negative influence on the psyche of the Muslim youth and helps breed the minority oppression ideology.

There maybe some who wrongly think that emulating a physical attribute of the prophet which was more of a norm at the time, rather than his attributes of justice, equality and peace, makes them endearing to God. But there are many good Muslims who follow the tenets of Islam and want to keep a beard simply for the love of the prophet. I see no fault in their ideology. Then there are others like me who hardly qualify as Muslims in the true sense and want to try out a beard. But who knows, it might catch the eye of a cop with a bias who may harass me unnecessarily. Is it worth the risk?

The day that Muslims lose all sense of victimisation by a "Hindu Raj" will be the day of a true victory for our secular democracy, but that day is far and there is a lot to be done, not only by the fractional secular share of the majority, but more importantly by the quiet eyewitnesses to an open onslaught of their own religion at the hands of people who call themselves Muslims. It is time for real Muslims to take a stand, to take action and to break this silence which allows mentally disturbed manipulators to contort a pure religion and teach violence and hate.

For the time being, the only advice to Muslims who want to experiment with facial hair without any social discomfort is to grow a moustache (no bar on style or size). For the more courageous souls, the moustache may be supplemented by a beard.

Warning: This advice is not applicable to Muslims seeking an easier access to heaven at the time of judgement by growing a beard, or those who want to strike fear in the hearts of non-believers.

11 comments:

  1. A well written and a quite articulate article, loved the warning written beneath. Felt nice reading an opinionated, at-times-aggressive, candid and honest story, especially after the mundane ones that came before. I do advise the use of a reference picture, illustration or something pictorial and visual that makes the story even more readable. About the content, I felt this view of a certain class of the society speaking that was reacting in a hyperactive way, espoused by your examples and your own admissions. Was disheartened to see your love for The Prophet be surpassed by a minor bigoted cop's harassment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To the elderly simian,

    Thank you for the words of encouragement. The previous articles were written to test the art of expression, and I welcome any critical remarks on that front.

    I thought about adding a picture of a bearded muslim which required a simple google image search, but decided against it. Probably because my purpose was not to up the entertainment quotient of the article, and I couldnt think of a picture that would really add substance. (In contrast, the pictures of the RISAT-2 were pretty important to the article)

    I didnt quite understand your statement about the view of a certain class of society reacting in a 'hyperactive' way. Could you please elucidate.

    Also, it would be heartening for you to know that a bigoted cops harassment could not have deterred me IF I was a man of faith. My views on religion remain similar to our previous discussions i.e. There is no god, man created god in his own image etc. Actually I'm tending towards the athiest view rather than the potentially lower risk agnostic view. But I am circumcised and have a 'muslim' name, and I havent chosen either. Just thought it might be a little hard to make the minor bigot understand the meaning of 'athiest'.

    ReplyDelete
  3. By my statement regarding a certain class I meant, that your views projected a certain class (economic) view that was reacting like it would always do in the face of a mere scare, like headless chickens. That would be quite a harsh statement in the present context, but I think the liberals and intellectuals who have fuelled this debate, which arrived basically after 9/11 from the West, has led to greater apprehension among us in terms of the beard, that wasnt present before. And hence I think, being even more sceptical and cynical over a non-issue will make us even more conscious and apprehensive of its presence in a country that is abundant in "Facial Hair" and cuts across religions and classes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I see that your own bias has crept into your comment regarding 'headless chickens'. So you feel that it is only a certain economic class that feels security is now a primary concern for Muslims in India. Muslim youth across the country has been picked up, locked up and labelled as terrorists, and you feel security is not an issue?

    Not only is your statement harsh in the present context, but also highly ignorant. What is the easiest way to identify a muslim? Why did Varun Gandhi mention 'scary' looking Muslims (to great applause)? Did the Muslim vegetable vendor (whom you courageously defended) have a beard? Would it have made a difference?

    The so called secular view, which labels a harsh reality as cynicism, is just trying to sweep dirt under the rug.

    Let the Muslims decide what is an issue and what is not regarding the problems faced by them as they can best understand it, and as you have neither the authority, nor the knowledge to make such statements.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Firstly, by contorting my statement to make a grave misjudgement over my not being concerned over security of a community, is unfortunate and misleading. (Please look into my text more carefully.) Reacting with even more vengeance and mentioning Varun Gandhi in the context is giving even more fodder to a ridiculous politician whose rise has solely been by news channels reacting in the same hyper active way as you. Thirdly, the vegetable seller did not have a beard and it would not have made a difference if he did have FACIAL HAIR. Fourthly, me nor YOU have an authority to make any statements on the Muslim youth and community considering my being outside the community and your admission of being somewhere between an atheist and an agnostic but since this a FORUM where we are out to discuss, debate, question and question again the views of our fellow contributors, i feel, your desire to refrain me from making statements is an extremely uncalled and profound ask. And even if you were a practicing Muslim, i still would not consider someone who lived comfortably in the upper echelons of New Delhi while working as an investment banker in the day and drinking fine alcohol in slick bars at night, would know intimately the sorrows of a community spread across the country. And a beard, unfortunately, is not the easiest way to identify a Muslim, if there is ever a need to.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, to play the part of a mediator, i think both your comments are myopic in their own way. Mr. Moneky, i do understand where your "i am against liberal western intellectuals making a big deal out of islamic fundamentalism" is coming from, but here, as a lot of other times, you have have not taken a more rounded conception of that stance and instead have put forth merely one aspect of that whole debate. Such an approach comes across more as inflammatory rather than argumentative.

    Mr. SLH, you have played right into Mr. Monkey's intentions of provoking you and obtaining a reactionary response.Your arguments so far have been well grounded and balanced and, to this reader, it seems unfortunate that you need to resort to TOI front page bantering to defend your point. Expressing your stance in a more grounded manner would not only limit the room for Mr. Monkey's antics but would also make for a more wholesome read.

    Moving to specifics, I do to some extent agree with Mr. Monkey on the idea that a lot of the debate and discourse around the issue does have a bearing on its perception and defines the construct within which a lot of what is happening today can be viewed. I think we cannot disregard the extent to which western, so called liberal discourse has had an influence on a lot of the social perceptions prevalent today. BUT, that is not to disregard the unfortunate state of affairs regarding the treatment of muslims both within india and outside. I don't think any rational person can argue against the clear danger of social and economic oppression that muslims in this country are increasingly having to deal with.
    Frankly Mr. Monkey, i DO feel that had the vegetable vendor had a distinctly islamic beard, the dynamic of that situation might have been a lot more complicated and different. That my personal reading of things anyway.

    Lastly, everybody,please do not refrain from saying anything you like...but please...lets not make things personal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Not an Act of Faith"---Sultan Shahin, Editor, newageislam.org
    http://www.newageislam.org/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1383

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. For the record...I think the article to which the link is provided is complete crap. I think it is ridiculous to expect any community or peoples to be grateful for being in a condition only because it is better than the worst. The idea that muslims should not complain about the kind of shit they need to deal with in this country because they're better off than muslims in other parts of the world is preposterous. These are not the standards that we need to reconcile to in this country, not for anyone. If nothing else, the fact that an entire community would face ANY sort of discrimination/marginalisation is unacceptable in a secular democratic nation like India. You may call such a statement idealistic, you may call it unrealistic, but these are the basic principles of our society and we cannot reconcile to ANYTHING else.

    Monkey, don't be a realist for the heck of being one.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Precisely my thoughts on the matter. This is a point raised quite often, for example during an episode of The Big Fight that I attended, one of the panellists (a BJP party member) said "what about other minorities, are they not in a bad condition?". Just because there are others suffering, or in worse conditions, doesn't imply that the rest should stay quiet. This is a completely skewed argument, and won't lead us anywhere.

    I have posted a comment on this article. Apparently it needs to be screened by the editor before it appears on the site. Will let you guys know when its done.

    ReplyDelete